{"id":1725,"date":"2026-02-08T20:43:39","date_gmt":"2026-02-08T20:43:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.allendowney.com\/blog\/?p=1725"},"modified":"2026-02-08T20:43:42","modified_gmt":"2026-02-08T20:43:42","slug":"dont-bet-on-the-super-bowl","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.allendowney.com\/blog\/2026\/02\/08\/dont-bet-on-the-super-bowl\/","title":{"rendered":"Don\u2019t Bet on the Super Bowl"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
If you have studied probability, you might be familiar with fractional odds, which represent the ratio of the probability something happens to the probability it doesn\u2019t. For example, if the Seahawks have a 75% chance of winning the Super Bowl, they have a 25% chance of losing, so the ratio is 75 to 25, sometimes written 3:1 and pronounced \u201cthree to one\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But if you search for \u201cthe odds that the Seahawks win\u201d, you will probably get moneyline odds<\/strong>, also known as American odds. Right now, the moneyline odds are -240 for the Seahawks and +195 for the Patriots. If you are not familiar with this format, that means:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
If you bet $100<\/code> on the Patriots and they win, you gain $195<\/code> \u2013 otherwise you lose $100<\/code>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
If you bet $240<\/code> on the Seahawks and they win, you gain $100<\/code> \u2013 otherwise you lose $240<\/code>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
If you are used to fractional odds, this format might make your head hurt. So let\u2019s unpack it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suppose you think the Patriots have a 25% chance of winning. Under that assumption, we can compute the expected value of the first wager like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If the Patriots actually have a 25% chance of winning, the first wager has negative expected value \u2013 so you probably don\u2019t want to make it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now let\u2019s compute the expected value of the second wager \u2013 assuming the Seahawks have a 75% chance of winning:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The expected value of this wager is positive, so you might want to make it \u2013 but only if you have good reason to think the Seahawks have a 75% chance of winning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Implied Probability<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
More generally, we can compute the expected value of each wager for a range of probabilities from 0 to 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
plt.plot(ps, ev_patriots, label='Bet on Patriots')\nplt.plot(ps, ev_seahawks, label='Bet on Seahawks')\nplt.axhline(0, color='gray', alpha=0.4)\n\ndecorate(xlabel='Actual probability Patriots win',\n ylabel='Expected value of wager')\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
To find the crossover point, we can set the expected value to 0<\/code> and solve for p<\/code>. This function computes the result:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here\u2019s crossover for a bet on the Patriots at the offered odds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
p1 = crossover(100, 195)\np1\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
0.3389830508474576\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
If you think the Patriots have a probability higher than the crossover, the first bet has positive expected value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And here\u2019s the crossover for a bet on the Seahawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
p2 = crossover(240, 100)\np2\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
0.7058823529411765\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
If you think the Seahawks have a probability higher than this crossover, the second bet has positive expected value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So the offered odds imply that the consensus view of the betting market is that the Patriots have a 33.9% chance of winning and the Seahawks have a 70.6% chance. But you might notice that the sum of those probabilities exceeds 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
p1 + p2\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
1.0448654037886342\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
What does that mean?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Take<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The sum of the crossover probabilities determines \u201cthe take\u201d, which is the share of the betting pool taken by \u201cthe house\u201d \u2013 that is, the entity that takes the bets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For example, suppose 1000 people take the first wager and bet $100<\/code> each on the Patriots. And 1000 people take the second wager and bet $240<\/code> on the Seahawks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here\u2019s the total expected value of all of those wagers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
total = expected_value(ps, 100_000, 195_000) + expected_value(1-ps, 240_000, 100_000) \n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
plt.plot(ps, total, label='Total')\nplt.axhline(0, color='gray', alpha=0.4)\n\ndecorate(xlabel='Actual probability Patriots win',\n ylabel='Total expected value of all wagers')\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
The total expected value is negative for all probabilities (or zero if the Patriots have no chance at all) \u2013 which means the house wins.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How much the house wins depends on the actual probability. As an example, suppose the actual probability is the midpoint of the probabilities implied by the odds:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
p = (p1 + (1-p2)) \/ 2\np\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
0.31655034895314055\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
In that case, here\u2019s the expected take, assuming that the implied probability is correct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
take = -expected_value(p, 100_000, 195_000) - expected_value(1-p, 240_000, 100_000) \ntake\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
14244.765702891316\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
As a percentage of the total betting pool, it\u2019s a little more than 4%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
take \/ (100_000 + 240_000)\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
0.04189636971438623\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
Which we could have approximated by computing the \u201coverround\u201d, which is the amount that the sum of the implied probabilities exceeds 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
(p1 + p2) - 1\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
0.04486540378863424\n<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
Don\u2019t Bet<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
In summary, here are the reasons you should not bet on the Super Bowl:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n
If the implied probabilities are right (within a few percent) all wagers have negative expected value.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
If you think the implied probabilities are wrong, you might be able to make a good bet \u2013 but only if you are right. The odds represent the aggregated knowledge of everyone who places a bet, which probably includes a lot of people who know more than you.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
If you spend a lot of time and effort, you might find instances where the implied probabilities are wrong, and you might even make money in the long run. But there are better things you could do with your time.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Betting is a zero-sum game if you include the house and a negative-sum game for people who bet. If you make money, someone else loses \u2013 there is no net creation of economic value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
So, if you have the skills to beat the odds, find something more productive to do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
If you have studied probability, you might be familiar with fractional odds, which represent the ratio of the probability something happens to the probability it doesn\u2019t. For example, if the Seahawks have a 75% chance of winning the Super Bowl, they have a 25% chance of losing, so the ratio is 75 to 25, sometimes written 3:1 and pronounced \u201cthree to one\u201d. But if you search for \u201cthe odds that the Seahawks win\u201d, you will probably get moneyline odds, also…<\/p>\n
![\"_images\/48c1402d18913b4e4a43f62a11e1f6206cac36ff426a02adefd811caa7714e50.png\"](\"https:\/\/www.allendowney.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/48c1402d18913b4e4a43f62a11e1f6206cac36ff426a02adefd811caa7714e50.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"_images\/4cbfc771ae7a96120417d15491ffc998549738a707551c824a63cfbaa12536b4.png\"](\"https:\/\/www.allendowney.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/4cbfc771ae7a96120417d15491ffc998549738a707551c824a63cfbaa12536b4.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n